We
live in an era where we come across different innovations almost every day.
Some help us with our tasks, some with daily chores and some ease up things at
the workplace. And if you look closely, behind each and every innovation, the goal is the same:
To reduce effort on our part and increase
efficiency.
Today, the word ‘manual’ sounds obsolete and
anachronous in itself. No matter what area we pick, the cloud of automation is
clearly overshadowing manual ways, and software testing is no exception.
Although there have been debates about automation
causing people to lose their jobs, unforeseeable costs, heavy one-time
investment and what not, automation testing clearly is a better option in
comparison to manual testing. Here’s why we believe that:
Better Return on Investment (ROI)
As an entrepreneur, your one and only goal should
be maximizing your ROI. In manual testing, the investment figures may seem
profitable to you initially, but as the project starts gaining complexity
approaching its end, a number of manual testing also becomes intensive.
Automation Testing, on the other hand, saves you the hassles of hiring new
people, and hence, of losing funds.
Load Testing
Automation testing allows you to check your
product under load. This is particularly helpful when you need to check how
your software behaves and responds under load environment. Load testing helps
you accurately determine the speed and stability of your software. In manual
testing, one has to carry out performance testing, which is significantly long
and tedious compared to automation testing.
Answerability
Automation testing is much more organized
compared to the manual. Each member of the team is answerable to what they are
assigned. Any error detected can easily be assigned back to the assigned person
and hence, the issues always addressed on time, ensuring timely completion of
the project.
No Repetitions
In manual testing, the software is tested every
time the developer makes a modification in the source code. This costs your
business, time, effort and money. Another issue with manual testing is that the
software has to be tested for compatibility with each platform it runs on. On
the other hand, automation testing automatically tests the software many times,
on various platforms, with modifications in the source code.
Efficiency in Test Case Generation
Test Case Generation is often a time-consuming
affair because of the requirement to create test scripts, whereas in Automation
Testing, algorithms using code annotations, path analysis, and user
behaviour-based script writing, test scripts are automatically generated. This
saves time and allows the tester to carry out more test at the same time.
Early Bug Detection
Manual testing allows the detection of bugs in
the later stages, which is cost-inefficient and brings down productivity.
Automation Testing is much more effective in this regard as it tests the
software along with the development process. This makes sure the error is always
detected at an early stage, maintaining the overall efficiency of the team.
Reliability
Test automation effectively rules out the scope
of human error because it involves fewer testers. Apart from that, the same
test code can be used over and over for different platforms and configurations,
reducing the chances of error to a minuscule.
Looking out for the perfect IT provider to handle
your automation needs?
Reach out FuGenX – leading a Mobile Apps Development Company Bangalore, India, by drop a mail at info@fugenx.com.
Also Read, an interesting blog: Cost to develop healthcare app like Practo
Also Read, an interesting blog: Cost to develop healthcare app like Practo
No comments:
Post a Comment